Feed on
Posts
Comments

Executive Function

Last week I was marveling at how young and idiotic I sounded as a teenager to my grown self. This week I’m marveling at how my son’s idiotic decisions remind me so much of my own at the same age, at how idiocy repeats itself.

When my brothers were in their late elementary years, I remember a game we played. They would take a long, flat board and cruise on it down the basement steps like an indoor sled. Worse, they let me do the same. When my mom caught wind of it, she was flabbergasted and irate. Their defense was that they didn’t let their significantly younger sister go down alone; one of them was always with me.

And really, with two kids speeding down steep basement steps on a long hunk of plywood, what could possibly go wrong? I somehow doubt my mom was reassured by their reassurances. Incidents like this are proof that children lack executive function.

For the most part, Simon is more cautious than I am. But even he has his moments, and I got a gander at one last night when Simon went over to his friend Leah’s house for a play-date. Leah had some new toys to play with, including a light-up remote control car and stilts. And really, what could be a better idea than to turn down the lights and have one of them teeter around on stilts while the other tried to crash the car into them? What could possibly go wrong?

On the other hand, I was also reminded of how much smarter kids can be these days. Simon and Leah played a chase game that involved them quizzing each other about the Chinese words for colors along the way. And in her role as hostess, Leah made place-cards for each of us with our name neatly written on it and a picture depicting our interests. Simon got a train, Matt a guitar, me a cup of tea. Her handwriting is better than mine. (Not saying much, true, but she’s only in first grade.)

So there they were—two really bright kids coming up with a ridiculous game nearly certain to end in injury. No executive function at all. Then again, it wasn’t likely to be a head injury, and as only children they have few opportunities to get into trouble like this at home. So their parents, all four of us, laughed and let them carry on.

Perhaps our executive function isn’t so hot, either.

*A necessary footnote. The board in question was used to create a flat, bed-like surface in the back seat of the family car so we could lie down to sleep on road trips. Safety first! When it came to road safety in the 70s, the entire nation lacked executive function.

 

 

Historical Sources

Once upon a time, I was a historian who regularly thought about primary and secondary historical sources. In my new life, this doesn’t come up unless I run into a fellow academic (former or otherwise) or something historical hits the news.

Until it comes time to clean my attic, that is, an occasion marked by the discovery of a whole box of primary and secondary historical sources that have left me with some questions.

First there was the 20-page account by Eddie Baer of my Bubbie Pearl Wolfson’s life. Eddie was an in-law, and he cobbled together the story of my Bubbie from interviews with her and his own knowledge as part of his Temple’s tikkun olam (service) project. I have questions. Like the depiction of my Bubbie and her siblings living in desperately poor—brink of starvation!—conditions in Moldova, eking out a meager subsistence on what my great-grandfather Nathan Kahn brought in from trading and made tolerable only by the prodigious domestic talents of my great-grandmother Freda Leah Kahn.

In versions of the story told to me by my mom, also via my Bubbie I assume, the family was traumatized by pogroms and outbursts of antisemitism, but were not desperately poor. There was always enough food, as Zadie Kahn made a good living as a men’s suit tailor.  So which is it? Did Bubbie embroider the truth to Eddie? Did Eddie infer or mis-hear? Or did my mom get a feel-good version of the truth?  Based on my Zadie Kahn’s manifest skill, I think the first two possibilities are the most likely. Similarly, I’d really, really, really like to know the identity of my Bubbie’s mystery suitor prior to meeting my Zadie, a person alluded to but unnamed in the account, but someone who allegedly proclaimed he might die if my Bubbie didn’t marry him.

Then there were the primary historical sources very much challenging my memory of my own younger self. Matt, as some of you may know, is a bit of a hoarder. Buried upstairs in two or three dirty and partially open boxes were the dusty mementos of his middle and high school years, including diplomas, photos, short stories with questionable titles, Bible Bowl trophies, the hilariously named “I Dare You” award (for untapped potential), year books, and letters and class notes from his high-school sweetheart.

Who would be me. Not that you could really tell it from the loopy handwriting attempting to be girly and pretty, the references to high school intrigue I cannot remember, or the alternatively overly dramatic and overly silly tone. They all sounded so teenage! I know I was 17 or 18 when I wrote them but gaaaah! I didn’t know I sounded just as idiotic as all those other teenagers. I thought I was so above all that drama. Don’t even get me started on the sorry-you’re-grounded care package I made for Matt back in 1987. One word: glitter. Two more words to describe the back-story: broken curfew.

We have a house now. And a child. Our last curfew came over 20 years ago. The only glitter in use is being wielded by our kindergartener. We’re both much better writers now. Who are/were those children? Could that really have been us?

These notes, cards, and glitter adornments made me flush with embarrassment. I gave very serious consideration to trashing them all, picturing Simon sorting through all our junk one day at marveling at how young and ridiculous his parents sounded. Then I decided that that was the point: Look at how young and ridiculous we sound! Perhaps he’ll be charmed. So I tidied up the heap, found a lid for the box, and put it next to the box holding my diplomas, certificates, and old family photos. You’re welcome, Simon. Also, don’t get too smug. One day you will sound just as ridiculous, even if our all-digital world won’t preserve the evidence.

TGIM! Or Not.

Between Simon’s soccer game and drum practice on Saturday, picking up a file cabinet from a friend, clearing out my attic in preparation of making it into a play-room, piles of laundry, grocery shopping, and dealing with the annual leaf deluge in our yard (So pretty in full color! Sooooo much work once they all drop.), Monday promised a welcome bit of relief from a non-stop weekend.

Simon does NOT agree. We had more tears this morning, as we have most days since THE INCIDENT. He’s doing better with making mistakes at home, we’re getting him to bed earlier, and I’ve been getting up earlier to cook him breakfast. So I know he’s better rested and fed. But science note-booking and giving up a dollar looms large, and Simon is running anxious these days.

I have more information about the incident, fyi. He didn’t understand something in his notebook, didn’t raise his hand to ask for help, and when the teacher wanted to talk to him about the unfinished or incorrect part, he broke down in tears. Mr. Sowder then asked him to use his words and suggested this was a little thing and not a big thing, and Simon still wouldn’t/couldn’t talk.  So Mr. Sowder took a dollar, and that’s when kindergarten took a wrong turn for Simon.

And here’s the thing. I get that Simon is different for Mr. Sowder than he is for us. I get that he might just want that dollar so badly that he’ll stop crying and start talking, or maybe even hold it together and not cry in the first place. I get that in kindergarten the message is that we can cry over big things but not little things. I get that next year he needs to have better coping skills. I respect what Mr. Sowder is trying to do.

But I think the whole thing might well blow up in his face. And ours. I’m not interfering—yet—but I know my kid. If being less than perfect leads to his crying, and if crying potentially leads to giving up a dollar and therefore tangible proof of lack of perfection, Simon is going to be anxious. And when Simon is anxious, his coping skills circle the drain, making him more likely to cry than ever. It’s a vicious cycle. Positive and negative reinforcement work well with Simon; punishment does not. He would do much better with some small reward (maybe a sticker in his chart?) for holding it together than he would being punished for not.

And typing that just now is the first time I’ve been able to articulate it quite that way. I wonder how long I have to let Mr. Sowder try it his way before I can start being pushy? Or more to the point, I wonder how long I’ll be able to let Mr. Sowder try it his way before I can’t stop myself from being pushy?

 

Legacy of Tears

True story. When I was in second grade, my mom thought I should be tested for our school system’s accelerated academic program. My teacher, Ms. Harmon, did not. She thought I was bright enough, but that I got too upset when I did not understand something perfectly right away. (Like borrowing in subtraction. Thirty-three years after the fact, I can still remember the fear and tears when I didn’t get it right the first day.) She thought I needed time to mature and develop a thicker skin and more patience. I think my mom was pretty miffed at the time, and I know she is/was in hindsight, especially given my future academic performance.

I, on the other hand, would like to reach back across the decades and kiss Ms. Harmon. I think she recognized a toxic blend of perfectionism and anxiety when she saw it and decided that tougher academics could wait a year or more for the sake of an 8-year-old’s mental well being. I never totally got over this destructive tendency. Until very recently, I avoided things I didn’t think I’d be good at and damn near killed myself to be the best at the things for which I had natural talent. Only since I have hit 40 have I managed to reverse this trend. Not caring if I’m bad at something or look ridiculous has been the single most liberating feeling I’ve ever had, and it has opened new doors to me.

My new challenge is to see if I can get Simon to this point in a shorter period of time. Like me, he is ruthless with himself when he makes a mistake or gets reprimanded. The punishment I or anyone else metes out to him pales compared to what he unleashes on himself, and seeing this destructive tendency manifest in my son is a terrible, terrible sight to behold. It pains me, all the more so because I know he inherited it from me.

Last Thursday, in science, Simon had to give up a dollar. His teacher monitors and tracks behavior using a class-dollar system. Every child begins every day with four dollars. You can give up one and still stay on green, which means your behavior for the day is good. If you give up two, you go on yellow, which is a warning status. If you give up three or four dollars, you go on red and the teacher and parent discuss the behavior and how to best correct it.

Until last week, Simon had never once given up a dollar. A quick look at the class behavior chart showed that he and one other girl were far, far ahead of everyone else in class. We’re talking Secretariat margins here. But last Thursday, something happened. I can’t get the whole story from Simon because he breaks down in messy tears when I ask about it. In fact, I only know about it at all because I overheard his friend James C. tease him about it on the playground. All I know is that he got confused in science, didn’t raise his hand to ask for help with something, was possibly also upset by another child’s crying, and had to give up a dollar. I’m guessing he didn’t do part of his notebook work. However it happened, Mr. Sowder used a serious voice with him, Simon forfeited the dollar, and now the world has come to an end. He has cried every morning before school, he tells me he hates science, and he is clearly terrified of something like this happening again. I’m pretty sure my kindergartener is engaging in catastrophic thinking.

I wrote his teacher, and Mr. Sowder assured me he’d have a chat with Simon about THE INCIDENT. Alas, Simon was so unnerved by Mr. Sowder wanting to talk about it, that he couldn’t tell me what Mr. Sowder actually said. Sigh. Based on prior experience, I can tell you that by the time Simon regains his equilibrium and can discuss this calmly, no one will remember the details any longer! This is the exact same reason I have deeply regretted it the very few times I have yelled at Simon. He falls apart so completely that the teachable moment is lost.

We saw the same behavior when he had McEnroe-esque meltdowns on the tennis court this summer. And we saw it this weekend when he made a mistake in his drumming practice. I was able to talk him down from that particular ledge by telling the (true) story of my trying a new, advanced move in pilates and literally launching myself off the equipment. It was a spectacular fall, and instead of being embarrassed, I thought it was hilarious and decided that I had a new goal to strive for. Matt tells me that when Simon made a mistake in his drum lesson, he nearly cried but regained his composure, carried on, and had a fun time of it. Later Simon told Matt that it was picturing Mommy falling off the pilates equipment that helped him. I’ve also talked myself blue about the importance of mistakes, the instructive value of failure, and how you can get better at almost everything if you give yourself enough time.

I’ve also told him about my B+ grade average in conduct, to assure him that well liked and well behaved children are not perfect. I was graded down for chatting too much, of course. I even stepped out of bounds to tell him that his smart, successful, and well liked cousin Ben has been on yellow before. (A lot, actually, but Simon didn’t need to know that part.)

Maybe some of this will fade in a week or so. It will surely get somewhat better. I will continue to haul out every non-perfectionist talking point I can. But my gut tells me that Simon has to come to this conclusion on his own. Please, please, please, can he get there sooner than I did? For both our sakes?

 

 

Reading Redux

Nine and a half months ago, Simon began to read. It was so exciting! Short little words to be sure, but the beginning of a fabulous adventure. By February or so, he worked through Hop on Pop. And then… well, and then a whole lotta nothing happened. Unless you count regression. We definitely had some of that, when Simon would try to guess at a word. If he was wrong and I pressed him to sound it out, as often as not he’d drop his head on the bed/couch/table/floor and feign exhaustion.

So I baked off. Way, way, off. Then kindergarten started, and the reading project began with renewed force. I left most of the work to the professionals, but occasionally tried to cajole Simon into sounding out a word. One night in particular I remember his getting really upset about not wanting to sound out a word when his guess at sight reading was wrong. He seemed so worried about the whole thing, and I didn’t understand why he was crying. He explained it like this:

“What if I can’t read to him?”

“Which ‘him’? Who’s him?” I was confused.

“You know. When I’m a grown-up and have a baby, what if I can’t read to him?”

How adorable is that? And how many not-quite-six-year-olds are worrying about reading to their speculative future children. I was floored.

Now the story advances to the last week or so. Simon has been reading signs and words on the tv screen. He’s asking me to spell everything. He read yard signs for political candidates and tries to read the names of countries and oceans on our map and globe. And last night he sat down and started to read Green Eggs and Ham. It had been ages since we read it, possibly 18 months or more, so he wasn’t working from memory. Between sight words and sounding out the simple Seussian vocabulary, he got all the way to page 27. At which point he paused, caught his breath, and then carried on to the end.

When he finished, I praised him to the hilt and told him how happy I was for him. “Oh, Simon,” I enthused, “all the things you’ll get to start reading and learning soon. You’ll never have to be bored! Whatever it is you are curious about—planets, a country, a person, volcanoes, anything!—you’ll be able to find a book or website about it and read and learn. It’s all so wonderful!”

Simon looked happy and more than a little relieved. Then he told me,

“Mama, now I know I’ll be able to read to my child. You know, like when I’m a grown-up and married and have a child of my own.”

I had no idea this was weighing on him so much, and I’m still surprised by it. Charmed even more. Now that the neurons are firing and psychic burden lifted, I get the feeling the reading adventure has well and truly begun. And if nothing else, he can always read Green Eggs and Ham to my future grandchild. Over, and over, and over, and over.

What? You thought you’d get through the entire 2012 election cycle without my blogging about politics? Come now, you know me better than that.

But barring one teeny-tiny paragraph, I’m going to spare you talk of policy and discuss something else, something that is—or should be—politically neutral. My teeny-tiny paragraph first:

Unlike many on the left in America, I never grew disenchanted with this president. I have not always agreed with his policies (The Afghan surge, for example) or his strategy (I think he was weak until very late in the game about defending his accomplishments and policy positions), but I don’t expect to. We’re all human, and no two of us should do or think exactly alike. What I have thought from day one is that this is a good, smart man with a fine mind and amazing temperament. I think Obama understands what it is to struggle. I think he truly cares about the welfare of the people. I think he’s run a largely clean and competent administration. I was proud to vote for this man four years ago; I was equally proud to vote for him again yesterday.

And that’s the end of that. Now lets move on to the sexy part: statistics and polling! I am not, nor have I ever been, a numbers person. But sometimes I think I really, really should be. Since June, I’ve been carefully following Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com. I discovered him five years ago,  when he was a baseball statistician recently turned to politics. Two years ago his blog was snapped up by the New York Times, but I still managed to keep an eye on him. Then just a few weeks ago I was directed to Sam Wang at the Princeton Election Consortium, a group of science and stat geeks that apply the mathematical rigor of their various fields to polling and politics. How mathematical? Here’s Wang last night:

“I actually don’t like Election Night that much – too much noise, not enough signal…and not nearly enough MATLAB.”

His predictions came in two flavors: Random Drift & Bayesian. If you, like me, are tired of gas-bag pundits on both sides of the aisle, these guys provide a welcome, analytical relief.

And so, in the last two weeks, I found myself fending off hysterical poll analysis on the left (“Gallup still shows Romney up a point nationwide! We’re going to lose!”) and shaking my head at delusional poll analysis on the right (George Will put Minnesota in the Romney column. Minnesota!). All the while, nearly alone among my family, friends, and social media circle, I would check out Nate Silver’s model, which weights polls, and Sam Wang’s model, which relies on meta-analysis of state polls, and be calmed by their findings of a slim but consistent Obama lead. While I was at it, I also learned why state polls are more reliable than national ones, which way various national polls lean and why, and a fair bit about sample sizes and how “likely voters” are determined.

While I was happily geeking out, some pundits and hacks turned on Nate Silver in ways that are ugly (“he’s effeminate!”) and uninformed (“He missed the 2010 UK election badly.” He did, but that analysis was admittedly experimental.) Sam Wang was too geeky to be much noticed I guess. Suddenly, everyone was talking about polls underestimating white evangelical turn-out, polls over-estimating minority and youth turn-out, the so-called enthusiasm gap, and the crutch of all horse-race pundits, the all-mighty gut.

George Wills’ gut predicted a 321-217 Electoral College landslide for Romney. Karl Rove’s gut? 279 to 259 for Obama. Michael Barone of the Washington Examiner called it 315 to 223 for Romney. Charles Krauthammer said it would be close but that Romney would prevail. Much of the nervous left predicted an Obama electoral win, but only if you clicked a button that made them put battle-ground states in one column or another. They were hedging like mad, and calling nothing. In the face of Sam Wang’s saying there was over a 98% chance of an Obama re-election (up to 99.2% on election day), pundits on the left still fretted and disbelieved. On election eve, every major newspaper and news blog I saw said the race was a toss-up based on national polls without delving into state polls of key battle-ground states that showed otherwise.

Meanwhile, Nate Silver put the race at 314.6 to 223.4 for Obama. And Sam Wang had it at 312 to 226. Without calling Florida, the race stands at 303 to 206. With Florida in the Obama column, it’s 332 to 206. Basically, Silver and Wang called Florida a dead-heat and did a metaphorical coin toss. It is in fact super tight in Florida, but it looks like Obama has won it. My own guess, fyi, had Obama winning with 303. I missed Florida too, but bettered many a professional pundit.

I wonder if maybe the next time the gas-bag pundits will listen more to the geeks. Will we hear less about their all-knowing guts? Will the stats geeks be less vilified? I’m not counting on it, but it sure would be nice. And just. Because just like in 2008, this time it’s the geeks who got it right.

Further Reading:

Nate Silver can be found at: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Sam Wang is located at: http://election.princeton.edu/

A glorious take-down of Nate Silver detractors may be read at: http://deadspin.com/5956562/nate-silvers-braying-idiot-detractors-show-that-being-ignorant-about-politics-is-like-being-ignorant-about-sports

For an illustration of what happens when the analysis is removed from poll analysis, take a gander at Unskewed Polls at: http://unskewedpolls.com/

 

Great Minds

While enjoying a sleepover at his grandparents’ house Sunday, Simon lost his second tooth. It had been loose for ages, and I had predicted it would go as much as two weeks earlier. Instead, it waited until he was eating a S’more, came out with the tug of tooth on marshmallow, and like the first tooth was inadvertently swallowed.

Still, the tooth fairy came at Grandma’s house. Evie wrote him a sweet note and put a dollar under his pillow. Simon appreciated the gesture, but wanted the Tooth Fairy to come again. “Why would the Tooth Fairy come twice?” I asked. “Because your parents are supposed to do it!” he answered. So much for maintaining the facade of belief.

Last night, Simon went to sleep dreaming of the Tooth Fairy’s return.  But I forgot to grab the tooth pillow out of his closet and wasn’t fully invested in the charade anyway. At one point, I joked to Matt that the Tooth Fairy might just sneak in the room, grab a piece of Halloween candy out of Simon’s bag, and put it under his pillow.

This morning, Simon awoke and immediately checked his pillow. Upon seeing it disappointingly unadorned, he launched into his campaign about the Tooth Fairy’s expected return. After he finished the justification and pleading stage, he issued two rules: (1) The Tooth Fairy can’t actually take his tooth (if he ever doesn’t swallow one), because “it’s very important to me”; and (2) This gem:

“Oh and Mommy. The Tooth Fairy can’t just take a piece of Halloween candy out of my bag and put it under my pillow. That’s illegal.”

I didn’t even fake outrage. I just laughed at how similarly our minds worked, even when desiring opposite outcomes. He’s mine all right.

El Niño Dificil

When I agreed to take over teaching Spanish at KIP about six weeks ago, I assumed that the hard part would be whipping my atrophied Spanish back into shape. So two weeks ago, I made a trek to Barnes & Noble and bought a Spanish grammar review. I have yet to crack it open.

On the other hand, tonight I have logged a considerable amount of time hunting for an old favorite, a book called The Difficult Child. When I last dipped into Stanley Turecki’s book, I was looking for solutions to Simon’s problems with change, timidity, and noise sensitivity. These days, Simon is pretty much the easiest kid around. But some of those 2-to-5-year-olds I’m getting to know? Whoo Boy!

Some kids are attention hogs. Some kids are super aggressive and have to win or go first at all times. Some kids are super physical and have a hard time sitting still and keeping their hands to themselves. Some kids have a hard time paying attention. Some kids are slow to catch on. Some kids are goofs. These traits are all normal and expected, and I feel confident I can learn more about them and develop strategies for management over time. I’m not sweating the quirks.

Then there are the children who have clinical diagnoses. These kids have extra support; I just stay out of the way, let the experts deal with them, and try to get them to participate and have a good time at whatever level they can. I’m not sweating these kids either.

Then there are the oppositional/defiant kids. Just today, I asked one child to put his crayon down. No go. Then I explained that I was being polite but that I was telling this child to put the crayon down. No go. Then I explained that I was going to count to three and “help” the child put the crayon down if said child did not do so. Still nothing. Then I reached for the crayon and had the child physically fight me over it. Being 42, I am possessed of greater hand strength than a preschooler. I prevailed. But I can’t help but think that I won using improper tactics. There’s got to be a better way when a child old enough to know better (two-year-olds don’t count) is defiant in the face of authority and continues to grab, hit, throw food, not share supplies, etc. I need to learn that better way fast. I’m sweating over defiance.

Most disturbing of all, there are the kids who are downright mean. I honestly didn’t think kids like this existed. I figured most “meanness” in childhood was really immaturity, a cry for attention, and the like. But what to think when certain children regularly say and do hurtful things to others and show no remorse when their victims cry? Are they all being raised by mean parents and/or suffering from undiagnosed psychological or medical problems?

Perhaps so. I hope so! I’d love to think that all of these kids can get over being mean with the proper interventions. However, that does me little good. I’m not a pediatrician or clinical psychiatrist. I’m not even full-time at school. My time and resources are limited when it comes to correcting poor behavior in the classroom. But I’m not willing to sit back and let kids be mean to their peers, and I’m not going to allow bullying on my watch. Nor do I want to become a bully myself. That means that my current teaching challenge is to figure out how to treat hateful behavior while maintaining empathy for the hateful child.

To be honest, this is a tall challenge for me. I have a hard time with mean. I hope Stanley Turecki can come through for me now as he did three years ago. And by all means, if anyone reading this is sitting on ideas or suggested reads, please do speak up.

Coda: Lest I sound overly negative, let me also state that some of the kids I’m getting to know are so sweet, bright, and/or funny that I’d love to take them home with me. From a blogging perspective, however, these children are boring.

 

 

Song Wars

A few months ago, Matt introduced Simon to the Rebecca Black song cum Internet viral video sensation “Friday“. I knew about it, but had never actually heard it. Lucky me! It is nails on chalk-board bad. For those blissfully unaware, Rebecca Black is the daughter of wealthy parents who shelled out some serious cash to buy a song for their daughter to sing and to let her record a professional video.  It features stunningly deep lyrics such as “Kickin’ in the front seat; kickin’ in the back seat; gotta make my mind up; which seat should I take?”

Matt thinks it’s the best worst song ever written, or at least sits high on the good bad song short-list. I’m missing the charm and have yet to make it through a complete viewing or hearing. Simon thinks the whole thing is hilarious with a capital “H”, and took to singing the song whenever he wanted to get a rise out of me.

Then I started teaching preschool Spanish twice a week. (Have I mentioned that yet? KIP needed someone on very short notice, asked if I could help out, and I said yes. I missed the place and interacting with the little ones. My Spanish was excellent 25 years and about 6 languages ago, so why not?) So yeah, I now spend two days a week trying to drum some Español into the heads of 2-5-year-olds, ideally without sounding like Peggy Hill while I’m at it. (Actually, Peggy Hill might be a welcome change. I learned Castillano, or the Spanish of Spain in school, meaning I lisp at every c or z. Thapatos, Thinco, and Justithia, oh my!)

Anyway, I learned in week one that the secret to getting little kids to remember anything is to sing it. So I largely scrapped my predecessor’s work-sheets and have spent some quality time using the Google to hunt down Spanish songs. Some are English-Spanish Frankensongs that insert Spanish words into otherwise English songs, some are little Spanish ditties set to familiar American songs or nursery rhymes, and some are authentic Spanish children’s songs.  As a result, I am singing all the time. I’m singing “Red is rojo” to “Frere Jacques”; I’m singing “Calabaza, Una Calabaza” to the tune of “Alouette”; I’m singing “Hojas, Hojas” and “Los Esqueletos”.

Many of these songs irritate Simon. All of them annoy him when I sing them too often for his liking. Which means his powers of annoyance are no longer one-sided. Whereas once Simon waged asymmetric singing warfare at me by sneering… oops, I mean singing “Friday, Friday” at every turn, I now sing right back at him. “Hojas, hojas, hojas se caen del arbol” or “Quando el reloj, marca las doce; doce esqueletos descansan por la noche. Tumba, tumba, tumba-ba.”

It’s awesomely absurd and a new part of our daily ritual. We’ve engaged in singing warfare in our car, on the way to the car, in the Brandeis gym when I collect him in the afternoons, at Panera last week, etc. The good news is that Simon knows he’s sometimes getting weird looks and doesn’t care; he’s fine with our sharing a goofy inside joke. The better news? We both have much better Spanish than we did a month ago!

And to atone for siccing “Friday” on you, let me also direct you to the charming Costa Rican song “Los Esqueletos“.

Happy Dia de los Muertos!

My Sweet Pugilist

Simon might be sweet, polite, and gentle by nature, but he’s still a boy. A six-year-old boy, more specifically. And sometimes what a six-year-old boy wants and needs more than anything is a good session of wailing on someone.

Poor Uncle Dan bore the brunt of sustained stuffed dolphin assault in Hilton Head this summer. Matt’s been on the receiving end of some aggression for months now, himself. And this past Sunday his Uncle Steve gave Simon soccer Boppers for his birthday. For those not in the know, these are inflatable boxing pillows that facilitate boxing without broken hands, broken noses, or lost teeth.

It was Ben’s idea, of course. My nephew is much more aggressive and fearless than Simon, and he’s been wanting to box for some time now. (Not going to happen.) Steve smiled weakly at me, slightly concerned that his peace love and harmony minded sister might disapprove of the gift. I smiled weakly back, figuring the gift would be good for a few minutes of fun and then forgotten. Or deflated. Definitely one of those.

At which point in time my empathetic, gentle boy put on his Socker Boppers and proceeded to wail on his cousin, his dad, and both his uncles for something like 30 minutes. He punched until his arm hurt, his breath came up short, and the hair on the back of his neck was wet with sweat. Basically, he punched until he lacked the strength to stand. It was a self-inflicted rope-a-dope!

The Socker Boppers have made repeat appearances every night since then. Our at-home routine is now comprised of dinner, homework, map-time, soccer (weather permitting), drumming, The Hobbit (Matt’s reading it to Simon for a second time), and hitting. As the suckers are still intact, we’re off to buy a second pair soon, too. Daddy needs a way to defend himself from the kindergarten pugilist.

 

 

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »