Feed on
Posts
Comments

Simon and I have a little joke:

“Why can’t Cambria do X [name of any random task],” I’ll ask?

“Because he doesn’t have any hands,” Simon will helpfully explain with a huge smile on his face.

Cats. Liberated from work by the lack of an opposable thumb; prevented from human play by the same.

Or, maybe not. Monday Simon and I got out Hi Ho Cheerio to play on the area rug in his room. Cambria loves this rug, so watching him sit down beside us came as no surprise. Nor was I shocked when he eyed the little plastic cherries sitting on their cardboard trees and attempted to swat one. But when he took his paw and batted the spinner? That surprised me. And when the spinner made a full rotation? That surprised me even more.

By the time he did it for the third time, I got out extra game pieces and had Cambria “play” with us. It was silly, for sure, but what did I have to lose by engaging in a little absurdity?

The game, as it turns out.

The object of Hi Ho Cheerio is to move all ten of your plastic cherries from your tree to a bucket. At the end of our experiment Simon had cleared his tree and won the game. Cambria had four cherries in his bucket. I had two. That’s right, I finished behind Cambria. Sometime soon, Simon is sure to tell a friend or teacher that his cat beat his Mommy at Hi Ho Cheerio. That person is guaranteed to chalk it up to a childish flight of fancy. But Simon and I will always know the truth and be able to share a conspiratory smile.

Absorption

My mom used to say that part of parenting required blind faith. You tell your kids the same things over and over and over and over, while they often as not seem to ignore you, and hope to live to see the day when some of that advice or direction sticks.

I got an early payoff yesterday. I was downstairs hanging laundry on the line when Simon came into the unfinished part of the basement with a play-sized basketball. About the same time I called out “Be careful!”, Simon called out “Oh no!” as he dropped the ball and watched it roll into our sump pump. Yuck.

I wasn’t mad, but I wasn’t excited about ball rescue either. “Oh, man. This is not going to be fun,” I mumbled, “and that’s why I don’t like you coming into this part of the basement.”

Mind you, I wasn’t mad. It was an accident, and he just wanted to keep me company. But what came next surprised me, because Simon sometimes (often?) struggles with apologies when he’s done something wrong. More than once an act of mild disobedience has ballooned into a major drama over his reluctance to apologize and our insistence that he do so. This time I wasn’t asking for or expecting an apology. I was just griping out loud when Simon quickly and sincerely offered this:

“I’m sorry, Mommy. I wasn’t paying attention to what I was doing. I’ll be more careful and won’t do that again. I’m really sorry.”

Did I hear that right? Was that a whole sentence, a demonstration of contrition, and an understanding of the source of wrongdoing? Wow! Maybe,  just maybe, some of what I’m saying really is sinking in. And maybe, but not likely, he can repeat this feat the next time I demand an apology from him. The jig is up, Simon: I know you can do it.

Idiolect

Simon likes language. I know that sounds silly, but what I mean is that he is very aware of the words and expressions he uses and tries to experiment with them. I’m hoping this foreshadows a lifelong interest in the written and spoken word. Until then, I’m enjoying the fruits of his unique idiolect.

Being only four, his experimentation often yields malapropisms. When he was a mere toddler, we were entertained by Simon’s attempt to use the word “embarrass” correctly. As in, “Bubbie, I’m embarrassed that the [traffic] light is still red.”

This past week, we had two doozies:

“Mommy! Don’t hug me so much. You’ll make my teeth hurt.”

Huh? And:

“Mommy, I’m so hungry I can hardly freak out!”

Then there’s his attempt to establish a timeline for his narrative. He struggles with the concepts of days, weeks, months, and years, so has settled on a catch-all for “time before now.” It’s “when I was three.” As in:

“Mommy, last week, when I was three, I chased Baron.”

Or:

“Last week, when I was three, I got a time-out for touching Gabrielle’s hair.”

In the first instance, it’s the “last week” part that is accurate; in the latter, it’s the “when I was three.” Mommy did have a little scare there imagining that her son got a timeout for harassing the same little girl twice.

And finally, there are the hilarious verbal meanderings that result from Simon’s exposure to different cultures and language. Like this:

“What starts with Q, Simon” [Q was the theme letter of last week.]

“Kwanzaa!” [Kwanzaa was one of the festivals covered in the pre-vacation holiday unit.]

“Actually, honey, Kwanzaa starts with—-“

“Can I get a purple lightsaber for Kwanzaa?”

Or this:

“Last week, when I was three, I went to see a movie called Arba’a. [Arba’a is the Hebrew word for four.] It was a number game.”

I would do anything for a chance to see and experience the world from his perspective for a day. It’s fascinating to witness how much his thoughts and expressions are clear and like mine at one minute, and then so opaque and alien the next.

Snow Day!

Our fifth, to be precise, but the first when I could get the camera out. Today we slept in, then headed to Caroline’s house for some sledding and hot cocoa.

Whee!

  • Time to get kitted out in bibs, jacket, hat, mittens, and snow boots? About 10 minutes.
  • Time sledding before Caroline called it a day (she was too cold)? About 5 minutes.
  • Time sledding before Simon was willing to go inside? About 20 minutes.
  • Time it took Mommy’s hands to recover? Still counting.
  • Time spent looking for better mittens online? See response above.

Civility

If my time on Facebook (or anywhere else people comment online) has taught me anything, it’s that people behind the screen can be a lot like people behind the wheel: total sociopaths. What’s more, there is something about turning 41 that has left me less likely to sit back quietly when others are being obnoxious.

In light of the Arizona shootings and some of the uglier conversations that have taken place in its wake, civility was especially present in my mind last week. This is the backdrop to a small story about email.

A little over a week ago, I opened my inbox and saw a message from someone I volunteer with. This person, whom I will call Connie, is one of the nicest people I know. We volunteer together, and she’s one of my mother-in-law’s best friends. She’s also a woman of a certain age, and like many (but by no means all!) women in her cohort, she is not particularly tech savvy. She forwarded along a warning about a “here it is” email virus.

My first thought upon seeing this was that it was likely a hoax and that after I investigated it, I would gently and privately alert Connie and tell her how to verify such information. However, another person on her mailing list beat me to it. And he was neither gentle nor private. His email, using “reply all” read as follows:

“This is a commonly known hoax that dates to 2002.  It took me all of 90 seconds to confirm that with google [sic]. The act of forwarding the hoaxes is a sort of virus of it’s [sic] own.”

Then he listed a few links, including Wikipedia.

Nasty, eh? I thought the “90 seconds” bit was especially dismissive. So I hemmed and hawed and then did a little research myself in preparation for writing Connie. And you know what I found out? Mr. 90 seconds had oversimplified things a bit.

There was, indeed, a “Here it is” virus in September and October of 2010. Reputable sources including McAfee Security and PC Magazine reported on it, and the virus was considered contained later in the fall. In the meantime, some folks took that story, conflated it with details of an earlier hoax, and that is what ended up in Connie’s inbox.

I sent off my note to Connie, but still felt like something more important had been left unsaid. So I wrote Mr. 90 Seconds himself:

“Hi XXX,

The “Here it is” virus was real enough in September, even if it did not work exactly as Connie described in her email.[Then I listed a bunch of links, all more authoritative than Wikipedia.] The current risk is deemed to be low, as most AV engines have adapted to it, but it was more than a hoax from 2002.”

I was just about to hit “send” when I had an “I’m 41 and not sitting back while others are unnecessarily rude” moment. So I added two little lines:

“Connie is one of the best people I know. A little kindness wouldn’t have been too much to ask.”

And then I hit “send”. I have no idea who Mr. 90 Seconds is. I hope to God he’s not her son-in-law! But I do know that among the various strategies for dealing with non-tech savvy people, better options exist than public rebuke. Ignore it. Teach the person. Create a filter so you never see anything he or she forwards. I’d also point out the irony of advertising a 90-second research project when it produces results of dubious merit (to say nothing of questionable grammar), but that would be…

… Uncivil.

Oh boy. We’re back to talking about death, and the conversations are getting more difficult and emotionally fraught. I still don’t think Simon really understands it, but he now understands it enough to be afraid and upset by the notion that we all die.

Thursday night, just before I turned out the light, Simon asked about Percy and Tristan again:

“Are they going to come back?” he asked.

“No,” I explained. “When you die, you can’t come back.”

“Oh. What did they look like when they died?”

“Well, they kind of looked like they were asleep. The doctor made sure nothing hurt, I was with them, and one minute their bodies just stopped working.”

“Did they lay their heads down? And close their eyes?”

“Yes.”

This last part was a lie. Percy’s eyes closed because he had a sedative first. In fact, when the vet came back after administering it, I could see his third eyelid before his eyes closed altogether. I didn’t like it. I wasn’t with him when he got the sedative, and by the time we were together again, I couldn’t be sure he knew it or that he hadn’t been scared earlier. And when Tristan died, with a single drug, it was difficult to tell when the moment came precisely because he kept his eyes open the entire time. But, you know, Simon doesn’t need to know all these details, especially when the deaths he is most familiar with are those of Darth Vader and Yoda.

That night, Simon awoke eight times between midnight and 7:00 a.m. He doesn’t get out of bed when this happens; he cries and/or calls out “help me!” until Matt or I go to him. On at least one of Matt’s trips, Simon told him that he was worried I would die.

Friday night, sometime between Where the Wild Things Are and In the Night Kitchen, Simon brought up death again, asking many of the same questions. When would Cambria die? I tried to change the subject, lest we all have another grisly night of non-sleeping. He slept like the dead (awful pun intended), but the subject wasn’t closed.

“Mommy,” came one of his first questions Saturday morning, “am I going to die?”

“Oh, honey, remember, you are young. You won’t die for a long, long, time. Most people are very old when they die.”

“But I will die?”

“Yes, honey, everyone dies at some point, just like everyone is born. It’s part of life. But it’s not anything you need to worry about now, I promise.”

And then, for the first time since we started having these discussions, a look of total understanding and terror flashed across his face. He began to shake and sob, managing to yell out “I don’t want to get old and die” between the tears.

Oh brother. What’s a parent to do? I hugged him. I reassured him that getting old was a long way off. We went over numbers: “You are 4; Ben is 8; Mommy is 41 (“That’s a lot of numbers, he told me last week on my birthday.”); Bubbie is 71; and when Uncle Dave died, he was 100. There are a lot of numbers between you and being old. You won’t even finish growing for 15 more years!”

The topic continued to come up all day Saturday. He had another breakdown when sitting on the potty of all places. How do you comfort a simultaneously crying and pooping child, anyway? The second most heart-breaking thing I heard all day was:

“Mommy, if you die while I’m at school, Daddy will have to come pick me up.”

I had to appreciate the contingency planning manifest in that one. That led into a discussion about how I’m a grown-up who takes care of myself and I still have my mommy, and that by the time I’m old enough to die, he will be a grown-up who doesn’t need me to take care of him, either.

Two things make these conversations particularly awful: First, the fact that you have to qualify everything comforting you might say with “probably” and “usually.” Simon is smart enough to understand that if I say “Parents don’t usually die before their kids are grown up,” that what I’m leaving left unsaid is that some parents do. And the second complication is that none of my references discuss these types of fears and questions in preschoolers; the questions I’m getting and behavior I’m seeing are straight from the K-6 playbook.

A quick call to my oldest brother, married to a shrink and the father of three, confirmed that they didn’t deal with this until their kids were “six or seven, maybe even eight.” That means that all of their suggested books and advice is geared towards kids two to four years older than Simon. I can borrow and listen, but I’m on my own when it comes to adapting anything they offer. So, again, I’m flying solo here.

I have another, possibly crazy idea as well. I don’t think I can or should tell Simon to not talk about this. But I’m wondering if on days like Saturday, when the subject came up every hour or so, I can try to at least have him cut back. Were he talking about, say, getting a new light saber, I’d treat it as an instance of negative persistence and say something like, “Honey, we’ve already talked that about several times today. You are getting stuck. Let’s talk about [insert something else we could do or play with] now.”

I wonder. Can I say, “Honey, you can ask me any question, and I will always answer it. But we’ve already talked about this a lot today. Why don’t we talk about fun things we can do, or how you played with Baron yesterday, or what you want to do with Grandma and Bubbie next week.”

Is it foolhardy to attempt amateur cognitive behavioral therapy on a 4-year-old? I’m about to find out.

Reversing the Ivan Curse

My dad has many fine qualities and talents. His sense of direction and spatial capacity do not number among them.  The same man who can tell you about every Dutch portrait ever painted, discuss drug interactions in dizzying detail, and make a rocking cradle that makes you want to have a dozen kids just so you can use it, can—and has—gotten lost in his own neighborhood.

I first realized how bad it was on a trip to Italy in my teens. Dad and I were walking from our hotel to a museum (or at least trying to), when we took a wrong turn. “Let’s sit down and take another look at the map,” I suggested. “We’ll just walk around until we stumble across it,” he countered. “It can’t be that far from here.” Having gotten lost in cars with him many a time, I understood that map reading was not his strong suit. What I didn’t realize is that map-and-directions-wise, he had abandoned all hope.

I, alas, inherited a less severe form of dad’s special hopelessness. The first signs showed up when I volunteered as a candy striper in middle school. I’m afraid that some of my patients got quite the hospital tour before arriving wherever they were supposed to go. I’m a very stupid rat in a very difficult maze any time you put me on a college campus. In fact, I finally got better only after using the following technique: When leaving a classroom, turn whichever seems the most instinctive. Then stop and go in the exact opposite direction.

I’m not joking. There’s at least one college friend reading this who is a repeated eyewitness to my navigational flailings.

Only when I moved to San Francisco did I get better about finding my way. Months of map study before I ever moved, the luxury of learning my way around on foot and on public transportation, and being surrounded by easily identifiable natural and manufactured landmarks is what made it possible. Back in Louisville, which is laid out in more of a hub-and spoke design and provides fewer landmarks, I can do OK navigation wise so long as I stick to familiar routes and study new ones ahead of time with the intensity of a yeshiva boy pouring over the Talmud. If my route has to change, my brain strains and the flop sweat begins.

This background is all a prelude to saying, with great joy, that Simon breaks the chain. Interested in street names and highways for a year now, he can accurately navigate his way home from school and to and from a variety of relatives’ houses. “Is this Kaye Lawn?” he’ll ask my mom. (It is).  “Ok, mommy, turn left on Speed. Now turn right on Cowling Avenue!” (Thanks buddy!) Matt has even trained him on the expressways:

What are we on, Simon?

I-64

East or West?

East!

It’s a hoot. He can still get a bit confused if we do an I-264 to I-71 to I-265 maneuver or take an unfamiliar exit. But he has a better understanding of basic routes than I ever did as a child.

And just three days ago, he stood at the top of the steps on the second floor at KIP, looked at the staircase behind him, and said, “We’re standing over the hall downstairs. They sit on top of each other.”

I’d say “of course,” but for the fact that it took me a couple of years to understand that my kitchen stairs sit directly on top of my basement ones. Simon, honey, I am delighted that your greatest challenge at University will not be finding your class. Thank goodness the curse is lifted! And no one, dear boy, will be happier to hear the news than your Zadie, a man who’s affliction has only lately abated, and then only due to the arrival of the personal GPS.

A Blip and a Laugh

So I was down for two days working in the KIP computer lab and scurrying to finish a grant proposal. Then the blog was down for a half day from a technical glitch. Deep thinking will have to wait. But I do have two funny quotes to pass on.

Simon to Evie at Noah’s Ark (a play area in her church) yesterday:

“Grandma, is there a possibility of you chasing me?”

There was.

Then last night Matt tucked Simon in while I tried to finish work before falling apart.

Matt: “Is there anything you want me to tell Mommy for you?”

Simon: “Yes, tell her I never fight and that I always listen.”

I love it when I get glimpses of Simon’s school life at home.

In early 2010, Simon said something that unnerved me. I was upstairs vacuuming when I heard him ask Matt: “Is that Leslie up there?”

Leslie was the housekeeper who came every two weeks. Although I did vacuum between her visits, I didn’t do it much or well. Thus, Vacuum = Leslie in Simon’s three-year-old brain.

Whereas just yesterday, Simon waked in the door, smiled that smile that means he wants something, and declared:

“Mommy, we need to vacuum up this mess.”

There was no mess. He had just vacuumed Sunday, before Alek and Agotich came over to spend the afternoon. Now, nearly a year into being housekeeper-less, Simon sees a lot more vacuuming, and it’s me behind the Kenmore Progressive more often than not. His interest is kind of touching. It’s also emblammatic of his general interest in how everything works. The newest inquiries have led to tours of plumbing in my mom’s basement, an explanation of buried electrical wires, and an up-close look at the vacuum cleaner bag in situ.

I’m on the hunt now for a small, lightweight vacuum that Simon could use. It can’t be a toy that doesn’t work, and it also can’t be too nice. Because I suspect that by the time Simon develops the ability to do a good  job, we’ll be fighting over his appalling lack of willingness.

Tangled

So Greg (friend, former neighbor, father of Ruby) calls us on Saturday with cabin fever. “Let’s go out. Wanna see a movie or something?”

I’m at a friend’s, getting my first introduction to Pilates (how can I move so little and still feel my muscles so much) and picking up the files from five years of the Sudanese Refugee Education Fund, now relocating to my house. Matt scrambles to find a decent kids’ movie and settles on Tangled as our only real option.

This is to be Simon’s first movie. Turns out, it’s Ruby’s first movie, too. Before the lights go down, Greg tells Ruby, “Now Ruby. This is just like The Nutcracker. You have to sit still and be quiet.” We’re not that cultured, so I tell Simon: “This is like watching a movie at home, but you cannot get up or talk out loud.”

I was a tad nervous that the movie might not hold Simon’s interest, being a Rapunzel retelling and all. You read all the time that boys will not go see movies with girls in the lead.  Thankfully, Simon missed that memo and was captivated enough by the action and the beauty of several scenes to stick with it. There was one wobbly moment where he looked over at me and said, “Mommy, I’m sick of this now,” but moments later the action picked up and he was sitting on his feet giggling and whooping (appropriately) out loud. And of course, action aside, there was popcorn to be had.

Ultimately, the experience left me with three good laughs:

1. Simon’s first glimpse at our anti-hero Flyn/Eugene: “Is he like Han Solo?” A little, in fact. I was amused that he recognized the archetype so quickly.

2. Ruby asks Simon in the car: “Simon, what would you do if I grew my hair all the way down to the ground?” Simon replies, “I would die.”  Our antihero turned hero does “die” for a moment, but I’m not sure if that’s the answer Ruby was looking for.

3. Then there was me. I spent an inordinate amount of time looking at the head villain, Mother Gothel, and thinking, “When I’m 50% gray, would her hair work for me?”

I think the answer is yes, but not at the same length. Gothel and I have the same curl pattern, but her hair looks thicker than mine. What does it say that I’m taking style cues from Disney villains? And for that matter, what does it say that, yet again, the villain is the most ethnic looking character in the entire cast?

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »