Feed on
Posts
Comments

For a variety of reasons, as of yesterday I had only posted one half of 2011’s pictures. Oops! This can be boiled down to my not liking the new Gallery interface (I’ve been complaining about that for a year I think), many of Simon’s pictures this year coming from Matt’s Blackberry when we were on the go, doing more work for other websites, and then laying off the computer during neck-gate.

So blah, blah, blah, a poor showing for photos for 2011. I’ve begun making up ground, so for those of you who are feeling deprived (ehem, Mom), please note that I have uploaded May, September, most of October (a few mobile pics remain), November, and December to date. That just leaves June, the month we traveled to San Francisco. Even being more discriminating in what I post will make that one take a while. Maybe by Monday…

Anyway, click on the image at the top or use the side menu to access the photo album and sample the year in photos that all posted late.

One of the more challenging facets of childrearing is trying to discern the difference between individual characteristics and general developmental stages. Almost all babies are lovey-dovey and smiley at around six months, for example, so how is a parent to know if their child is affectionate or just hitting a set stage? You really don’t, and you especially don’t if you only have one child. I last wrote about this in November 2010, when I learned that Simon’s style of playing hide and seek reflected an age-specific inability to shift perspectives.

Just in the last 24 hours I’ve encountered two more instances of developmental stages being able to explain behavioral characteristics. I’ll start with the ugly bit that I can explain with anecdote, then move on to actual science.

This Christmas, Simon’s gift getting behavior left a lot to be desired. He cleaned up pretty well at Chanukah, too, but was one of five kids getting presents, and I mostly tried to make him wait his turn between opening gifts. Christmas, however, was another story entirely. Our family tradition is to have Christmas Eve at my house and open presents after dinner. Simon is the only kid at Christmas, and as such he gets a disproportionate amount of loot. This has always been the case, but this year the scales were more out of balance than usual. Matt and I got him several small things this year instead of one big thing, and Jim and Evie’s gift to the adult children was a vacation this spring, a lovely gesture, but something that cannot be wrapped and set under a tree.

What this scenario spawned, to my horror and embarrassment, was a kid who grabbed, shredded, ripped, and tore his way into presents, only to hardly look at them before saying delightful things like, “What else did I get?” I didn’t see it coming and was somewhat at a loss to know what to do. In the end, I tried to correct him on the spot and then set aside some to open on the last day of Chanukah. We needed to stem the tide somehow.

So did my lovely boy turn into an ungrateful brat overnight? I was a tad worried until chatting with Caroline’s parents yesterday. I described the scene and my horror, and Carrie (Caroline’s mom) made sympathetic murmurs on her end. Turns out, Caroline did the same thing this year AND last year. And this is just about the least grabby kid you could imagine. What’s more, now that I think about it, I remember a Chanukah when my nephew Nathan was six or so when he took a careful inventory of presents to make sure he had the most. My sister-in-law was mortified. How I wish I could go back in time and say, “Tia, it’s not him—it’s the age!” Which isn’t to say that such behavior should go uncorrected or that all kids do it, just that it seems pretty common and isn’t the end of the world.

Next up comes the science. This past August, I struggled to create and describe an inventory of new behaviors in a post titled (Almost) Five. What I was seeing was Simon’s sudden ability to accomplish many new physical and cognitive tasks, an increased sociability, better empathy, a greater preference for his own gender, and a general sense that he was taking his place as a little citizen of the world.

Lo and behold, The New York Times ran an article yesterday called “Now We Are Six: The Hormone Surge of Middle Childhood,” which detailed and explained the exact suite of behavioral and physical changes I had attempted to catalog and characterize.

According to the article, middle childhood begins around five or six, when adrenal glands begin to pump out brain-affecting hormones such as dihydroepiandrosterone, or DHEA. This endocrinologial event is called adrenarche, and it fuels a great leap in cognitive ability and ambition. At about the same time, the brain has reached nearly its adult size. With all the pieces in place, the brain sets about establishing and reinforcing the billions of synaptic connections that are required for intellectual, emotional, and social development.  Here’s the money quote from the article:

Middle childhood is when the parts of the brain most closely associated with being human finally come online: our ability to control our impulses, to reason, to focus, to plan for the future…

… Middle childhood is the time to make sense and make friends. “This is the period when kids move out of the family context and into the neighborhood context,” Dr. Campbell said.

The all-important theory of mind arises: the awareness that other people have minds, plans and desires of their own. Children become obsessed with social groups and divide along gender lines, girls playing with girls, boys with boys. They have an avid appetite for learning the local social rules, whether of games, slang, style or behavior.

That’s exactly what I started seeing in Simon this summer! I attributed it to his turning five, and that was certainly part of it, but more accurately this summer is when Simon entered middle childhood. According to the article, middle childhood has been largely overlooked in science as it lacks the drama of infancy or puberty. But you know, I think drama is highly over-rated. To me, these quiet and unflamboyant changes are the most exciting and interesting developments I’ve tracked thus far.

Hurray for middle childhood!

Chanukah Grace Notes

Chanukah this year did not get off to a great start. In fact, it started with a tray of home-made dreidel treats falling off the roof of our car and splattering all over Taylorsville Rd. I had put the tray there when loading the car, and then promptly forgot about it. Surprisingly, it survived a two-mile jaunt through the neighborhood. Not surprisingly, it did not survive a turn onto a busy street. The accident left Simon in tears as we drove to the family Chanukah party.

I think it was an omen, and I don’t even believe in omens, because the party totally did my head in. I know how that sounds (i.e. bad and/or ungrateful), so let me explain. Every year, my mom works to arthritic exhaustion getting ready for the family party. Sandwich stuff is laid out, side dishes are prepared, presents are selected and wrapped, and mandel bread—the stiffest dough imaginable—is lovingly stirred, shaped, baked, cut, and toasted to make the day special.

The problem is that the Goldstein kids don’t see each other often enough these days. Therefore, when we do finally get together, the siblings dive into rushed conversations and jokes while the kids, many of whom are at or approaching teenagedom, run wild. In other words: I love my family, and I love holidays, but I do not always love family holiday parties.

This year, per the usual, I arrived early to help set the table and to peel, grate, and squeeze dry seven pounds of potatoes. About the time mom really needed help getting the food all set out, the siblings and cousins were arriving and diving into full mayhem mode. So Mom had to yell to be heard over the din. As did Matt whenever he needed to tell or ask me something about Simon. As did I when I attempted to tell people to grab something, set something somewhere, or even just grab a plate and start eating. Not that anyone was listening to me…

I was noise-stressed before we ever got to present opening, an activity that devolved from loosely organized and loud to full-blown chaos within ten minutes or so. By the time the party ended, I was completely shell-shocked. I don’t know who got what from whom. We never played dreidel. We lit only one menorah, and the teens were texting during that part. I only took about four pictures before giving up. There’s got to be a better way.

When I got home, I wanted nothing more than an hour or so of lovely, lovely quiet, and the highlight of my day was slipping into bed. So, yeah, that’s where Chanukah stood as of this morning. Then today I took Simon to his swim lesson, his last of the year, and Ms. Julie had a treat and card for him. These lines especially caught my attention:

“Thank you for coming each week with a smile and a willingness to learn. You are often the highlight of my day, and always my favorite lesson.”

What more could any parent want to hear from one of his or her child’s teachers? I can’t think of anything. It was the best present I could have asked for, until…

…Until we went to bed tonight. As I snuggled next to Simon on his new Spiderman sheets (a gift from my mom), Matt brought in the little LED menorah he made just yesterday and set it for the second night. Since I hadn’t lit our real menorah yet, I decided to sing the tunes right there. When I finished, Simon chimed in:

“No Mommy, that’s not the right tune. Here’s the way I like to sing it.”

And damn if he didn’t sing the entire first blessing, in Hebrew, complete with a few repetitions and embellishments I vaguely remember my friend Sharon (a cantor) using. He’s been hearing this tune at preschool Shabbat for years now—I think—but never once let on before tonight that he remembered or could repeat any of it.

A great swim lesson, a sweet note from Simon’s teacher, and being serenaded by Simon in Spiderman sheets by the glow of an LED Menorah. Yeah, my Chanukah is looking up.

Happy Holidays!

Stationery card
View the entire collection of cards.
Many of you will be getting this in the mail, but there are always a few where I don’t have the address.

Pillow Talk

Simon’s bedtime chat with me as we lay side-by-side in his bed, a pretty accurate snapshot of life with him these days:

“Mommy, what’s 3 plus 2?”

“You tell me?

“Um, 6?

“No, use your fingers if you have to.

“Oh! 5!

“Right.

“What’s 2 plus 2?

“You tell me. (hereafter “)

“4

“What’s 4 plus 4?

“”

“8

“What’s 10 plus 10?

“”

“30?

“No. Forget the zero. Both numbers have them, so hide it for now. So what’s 1 plus 1?

“2

“Now add the zero back.

“20!

“What’s 20 plus 20?

“”

“40!

“What’s one hundred plus one hundred?

“OK, same thing as before, only now hide and then add back two zeros.

“200!

“What’s 600 plus 600?

“No Mommy, you tell me.

“Twelve-hundred. Or one thousand, two hundred.

“What’s twelve-hundred  plus twelve hundred?

“Twenty-four hundred.

“What’s twenty-four hundred plus twenty-four hundred?

“Forty-eight hundred.

“What’s forty-eight hundred plus forty-eight hundred?

“Niney-six hundred.

“Wow, that’s as high as I can go. Is this the third song? (We play a CD at bedtime, and I’m usually kicked out of the room when the third song begins.)

“It is, it’s ‘Michele’.

“OK, I need to go to sleep now. All this talking about numbers has made my brain tired.”

At this point, he rolls over into bed with Dirty Dog, who makes a monkey and not a dog sound “to joke [me].” Prior to this conversation, he hid something down his pajama shirt with a sly grin  and explained that he was being “like when Grandpa took Ringo’s card [invitation]” (“A Hard Day’s Night” reference).

Have I mentioned lately that talking to five-year-olds is awesome?

 

Holiday Cheer

Yesterday Simon has his class Chanukah party. He ended up with a Hot Wheels toy, which I was surprised fit into the assigned budget. Then I saw how flimsy it was and was less surprised. Simon loves it, it breaks on contact, and he’s been one frustrated little boy for the last 24 hours. At one point tonight it broke while Matt and I were finishing dinner. Once Matt was finished and walked over to help, he noticed that the toy was wet.

“Simon?” he asked. “What happened? This feels wet.”

“That’s from my tears.”

Oh boy. But he seems to arrived at a better place by tonight:

“I shouldn’t have chosen that toy, Daddy. It looked so good and I really wanted it, but I shouldn’t have chosen that toy.”

Then, while decorating the tree, we got this gem:

“This ornament is beautiful—like me!”

And perhaps most in the holiday spirit, this exchange over his Chanukah present.

“Are you getting me the Mega City [Japanese toy train] set? I really want it.”

“Do you know how much it costs?

[After several guesses.] “A hundred dollars?”

“More, even. That’s really expensive. Do you think we can afford it?”

“Of course we can. We’ve got money all over this place! There’s the piggy bank in my room…”

Glad he’s got this all figured out! For the record, the train set is in the trunk of our car. We’re pretty grinchy around here, but he’s usually worth it.

 

Last year, all spring it seemed, Simon increased his rate of daytime sleeping, had more night-time sleep disturbances (usually involving waking up between 11:30 and midnight and hollering “Ow!”), and ate non-stop. At the end of this period, he had grown about four inches in six months, hit a plateau, and started eating less, sleeping less, and yelling “Ow!” less.

That period of tranquility appears to be drawing to a close. For the last week, Simon has resumed non-stop eating, mid-afternoon napping, and nighttime partial awakenings. He’s also grown another inch since we last measured him in late July.

So is he gearing up for another giant spurt? I’m sure he is, but I’m not sure what kind of spurt is coming our way. It could be height again, but Simon seems to be on the cusp of a huge cognitive shift as well. Here are some signs we’re seeing:

Creative:

More imaginative play, and imaginative play that lasts longer. It is largely because of this that Simon has been seeking out the company of slightly older boys of late.  He’s also started drawing more pictures and telling us stories about what he’s drawn. Drawing still isn’t a big draw for him (see what I did there?), but he’s doing it way more than he used to.

Math Readiness:

The leaps in math understanding have been huge and are largely owing to playing Cars Monopoly. All that obsessive money counting has resulted in Simon’s ability to do simple addition and subtraction in his head up into the teens. He can’t do it all the time, and the longer he thinks about something, the more likely he is to make a mistake. But more than half the time, if I ask how much money he will have after he buys a property, collects rent on a property, or has to pay rent, he gets it right.

He’s also begun writing all his numbers correctly and likes to play a game where I say a three-digit number and he writes it down. This comes after months and months of Simon obsessively quantifying things: How old is X? How much older is X than Y?  How old will X be when Y is Z?  How tall is the tallest man? How tall is Daddy? How much taller is the tallest man than Daddy? And on, and on, and on.

Then there’s the endless grilling about what we do every hour of the day I’ve been subjected to for a few weeks now. I was just about to stop answering him when one day last week he read the clock in the car and announced that at that time the next day he’d be in swimming class. Now I understand that he was measuring, sorting, and categorizing time the same way he measures, sorts, and categorizes everything else.

Reading Readiness:

And the biggie… Six months ago or so, Simon was trying hard to read. He knew all his letters and their corresponding sounds, but he couldn’t blend them. I couldn’t help him, nor was I inclined to. I’m not a teacher, and I suspected he wasn’t truly ready yet. Then he abruptly turned his attention away from books and reading to more physical pursuits: We spent the next several months hitting balls in the back-yard, biking, taking swim lessons, learning to climb, and kicking a soccer ball.

And now we’re back. Today, as we got ready to leave school, Simon looked at the sign beside our car and said, “No, paar…” The sign read “No Parking”, and Simon was able to get two of the syllables. Later, when we stopped for a treat while holiday shopping, he noticed the sign on the coffee shop door. “Mommy, what’s that? No  smoh…” That would be the “No Smoking” sign.

Now, I’m not saying he’s going to start reading next week, next month, or next spring. I have no idea, honestly. What I do think is that the wheels inside Simon’s head are spinning at an accelerated rate these days, and that a few months from now I’m going to have a kid who linguistically, socially, or mathematically is far ahead of where he is now.

Also? He might be doing all of this while wearing size 6 pants. Cross your fingers for good post-holiday sales, eh?

Simon has something he’d like to say:

“I’m taking my talents to __________.”

I kid, I kid.* I do honestly understand that this is not as high-stakes a game as most incoming kindergarten parents make it out to be, even if I can’t totally shake the anxiety myself. Honestly, I think Simon would do well at Bloom or Brandeis. It’s some of the other options that worry me, the ones that are far away and post terrifyingly low test scores. Having said that, between the two excellent options with reasonable odds I’ve explored, one is a better fit than the other.

The cock-roach Matt met at Brandeis last week belonged to my niece Maddie, and one of the kids listening to a third-grade presentation about a famous mathematician was my nephew Ben. We’re going to see if Simon can get into Brandeis for the following reasons:

  1. Test scores: I know they don’t tell the whole story, but it seems foolish to ignore them. Bloom and Brandeis are pretty much tied in reading and math scores. But Brandeis is up 18 points in writing over Bloom, and 30 points in science, and that difference is significant. I think part of the issue is that Kentucky recently changed its required science standards and Bloom is working hard to catch up, whereas Brandeis has science at the core of its curriculum all along. I can’t explain the writing difference as neatly.
  2. The media lab: If I had to guess what put Brandeis’s writing scores so high, I’d put it down as the results of Ms. Bell’s work in the media lab. Surely having kids write dramas, poems, and essays about all topics improves writing skills across the board. And I’ve got to say, the creativity on display in the students’ written samples just blew me away. I wish I could remember some of it to quote.
  3. Art vs. Science: Bloom gets the nod in the former; Brandeis in the latter. Five year old Jessica would have been happier at Bloom. Dancing and painting and sculpture oh my! But Simon’s not an artsy kid unless you count music. He’s happy enough to sit down with some play dough or do a bit of coloring, but it’s neither his passion nor his strength and he bores of it quickly. On the other hand, he loves to write numbers, type numbers, and obsessively count, measure, and quantify everything else. He can do simple addition and subtraction in his head, sometimes up into the teens. He used to always ask me to pop up the hood on the car so he could see what was under it, he’s made me give him a tour of household plumbing, and he loves “helping” Matt put together model rockets and the like. And remember his solar system derby hat?  I think his talents and interests are in the math and science arena, making an MST magnet a good choice for him.
  4. The fun factor: This is one of those intangibles and hard to judge based on a 60-minute tour, but I think the kids and teachers at Brandeis might be having a little more fun. The science essays at Bloom were fine, but nothing can compare with the fifth grade goof-balls at Brandeis creating a talking blood cell and imagining a doctor passing out at the mere mention of blood. I also liked that the teacher let them keep that bit in.
  5. The diversity: This is the part where I can’t take myself out of the equation. When I was a kid, I was interested in and befriended just about every kid whose parents were from somewhere else I bumped into. There weren’t many, but I managed to have friends who were Filipina, Indian, Chinese, and Persian. And when the ESL kids had an open house in high school, I was one of the very few Kentucky-born kids that dove into the Vietnamese food unafraid. I took one look at the student body at Brandeis and knew that (a) I would have loved it myself and (b) it would provide an education for Simon. We live in a world that’s getting smaller all the time; I’d like Simon to grow up comfortable around a wide range of cultures.

So that’s that. Next up is the paperwork, a two to three month waiting game, and doing more tours to decide what our third and fourth choices will be. I won’t bore you with that, though!

School Picture

I didn’t think Simon looked that different this year from last. Then I got his school pics back. Last year’s were better, fyi. His hair has an odd bump  here and I’m not sure why we buttoned the top button. Regardless, the boy has really stretched out in the past year; everything here—-face, hands, arms, neck, torso—is so much longer and leaner than it was in last October’s portrait. I miss some of that old, little-boy soft roundness he used to have.

Now we come to two of the three schools we have visited to date:

  1. Bloom, our “resides” or neighborhood school, and the B-cluster school we have the best shot of getting into;
  2. Brandeis, the district-wide MST (math, science, technology) magnet school, and our favorite of the two magnets we toured.

Helpfully, we visited these schools on back-to-back days. To have a shot at Bloom, we need to rank it first among neighborhood schools and fill out our general assignment paperwork completely, correctly, and on time. That means I’d be delivering it to the school the first week of February. To have a shot at Brandeis, we need to rank it first among magnets. We are also required to submit an evaluation and skills summary from a teacher or care-provider. Applications are scored by team, and parents may earn points by attending a Brandeis tour, going to the JCPS showcase of schools in late January, and attending a Brandeis family night in February.

Either of these schools would be a fine option for Simon, but we think one is a better fit for him than the other. Come along and see if you can tell which one it is. There will be a quiz at the end. Descriptions and more after the break.

Continue Reading »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »